Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:58:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7C214EA1AF5632B4962872347574CDC35B76758FACD1526331441D3A9D16EEA3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details