Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:52:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 77435D2B5B95DE0B3FFD5736623B5F8B4377BF6CC795F8F91A68A6752B2D85FD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details