Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 07:22:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 773139847D39C0FE2045E61D2DD7B9FD2D7F131A60E578F7268FABA647E22584
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details