Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 18:03:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6D0DC53135654F3F167FD980647FD6E2B96A186B6741B33369BDE7905FE6BD80
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details