Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:26:16 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6C6D92BFE3C9E4B6B392143DAF2F3E48C20875F321BFCB28805DBEC2139DEB72
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details