Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:10:30 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6B9A44CE8E5C940FFB1454055E344D4293D7B325207F8C6681C3198D95EABB2A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details