Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 15:41:32 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 67F148B4FAA79EF908B62DD271213A6F274FC9E5EB1AC345B80F2B5026C44B4B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details