Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 05:03:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 66017F536B2E47A1D0D31C30BE9D60F1B208A65A60308F9D0CF07DF699504A4A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details