Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 06:38:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 637B1F5F005AD94EC263217B07AE9E4752411554CD1D06239FE13A661C677EBB
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details