Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 02:02:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 607CCC45FCE8158A25302617919C661EDDF4DD4200A5D3DA911AE3F072A0F4E0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details