Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 05:57:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5AD927453AEAFC351C1B2E8584D58BCA0A6504D7AB41A14DB3EDBEE5E0933ADD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details