Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 10:41:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5ABEF59CB78C16B21179F0F3BF0B6445BF36782D705ABF3203D6BEADF0AD343D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details