Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 06:05:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5774DB857C586D896695A0E762D039B95C0B7717E4CAD8FB417D6471727D4AC7
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details