Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:22:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5692558CD4C01F41F84C6A407D8E10856962C207E73FD3BD6287B7F417BFB65C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details