Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 02:32:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 558E0A07387DA67D92922C637ADAC7176FCF94107690450272DE0F3FB525D378
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details