Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 07:40:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 53F4DCD27C09872A1CBCAE0B74ADB208F1943674F6223CFF3B8DC463D121A173
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details