Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 20:20:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4F6087214762EB7550C0EDAF075E53C2ABD34174A1127E70D15C1C75B04B1A0B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details