Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:45:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4F21CC9871341C2DE8C1051A392FE41A30522F96E50A00A32499EFC95D818366
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details