Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:48:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4F0F864C3EA913AE46ACD86EAC5D63725C34FD0C1254AB9F2060F3A15427C0C5
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details