Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 11:33:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4EAB9BB699EFFAE64F13E6A14A8D2C1B3FE24D05E9919E70033F03C33E9A2FF4
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details