Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 07:03:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4C2C5A7839C1781D9BD9F2C1DD2B40844AC5B6BE0177B8A4518EAAB475775DA0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details