Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:19:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4B9D60766E3B4167898F3D03734F0AA3D873A93128027A56755E8B7C40C10052
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details