Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:20:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4B3F5AAD6A8E5E411525725572CA891CC98FB1455B3A7A3E7873E5B276E8DAA2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details