Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 12:34:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 48DC671E65B05434081DD77CE9B1D0274E41DB56EF100143BD782ACEA582A1F9
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details