Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 05:56:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 48C00B36B958A962A4087967A7412143A86B54EB17146C8D6A67D7F674943677
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details