Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:30:41 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4481654C679D2E8D02664EF7F05AF5B7290EA1226B0E9AED06D8DC1AED0855F3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details