Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:40:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4350E7E2B17ABA1D2D20639EB57531BF2C6280EAA9A3DF20A7BA3040F1EB2EE0
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details