Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 00:06:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 419309F17E0DAAFB6860773253E8EC1C2B64C39D0155C1DF5E5E0CC9EB589860
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details