Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:28:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3A47F3046EEFD8B027BB7FE3A5BF68213B6272E2422F32C59BBAA1DA884D9F4D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details