Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:32:51 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 35F351489D0E2B7EE27BBE2F7C278601BCB9F1A6FE839506063199B6FF345C7E
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details