Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 19:34:56 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 34F003358E9087389698F3984E2F78658723A9050D5A161EF01C6F45A755AF44
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details