Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:30:25 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3059A4E5E7D6CA6AF08683D38EABF90BC841BD80A327BD79F0A366136559BC2C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details