Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:52:35 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2ABE04B9547A2C75D346DFCDC401EE3A791C2FC1CEBD28957FFB76551C7B1C15
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details