Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 20:39:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 22E68FC56A5D7097D2D57216534C307A0F45F6D4943B9A418B43207F5550B749
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details