Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:44:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 21A0FEB06BDD8549C29369EEB06E71AD9DDB3274C6947BE6FF1AE444C0DC9503
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details