Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 09:42:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1F07D96645DD8524E22F14DDBAC1FCDC5164AC0656EB00B4D28A8A98925453A2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details