Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 17:39:32 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 186500BF86C1BAA5D08AB4D68641BA2035143A7D134B56FA2F7ADCFA11357A5B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details