Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 15:14:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 185C997EB201ACEC4A518A5BCED0BB1B03D505C6EF0D99BAF09C7D47D74BA4D3
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details