Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:12:30 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 16C1102C5B4BC2E0D08AD3BE4F1C4DA7C7AA288CB651551E724C8FB7296FF284
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details