Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 12:43:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 14F66E5CD40102D9BE2D261C5906DBC0B5D13C71CAA8CB5A7FBB70ABB96E6808
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details