Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 14:32:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 14CE6DA37FDF1407BBBA32DF2D290C510349258EBDE9F332FEFE66519ACB808A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details