Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:31:30 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 12FF7A0ABF3F6AA23FC40CBAB251BD2E631968EE5DF2318FE1A8E25ADD9A0059
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details