Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:22:38 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0CBF30A0623C7EE0D6B2902EE5B5BF5EB421C2AAF7EE84155EDC0EA4F1DA0C83
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details