Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 11:19:20 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0C84FEFA2369D99F8EA2437FD70E2C071517C769334363044CF8FC48B73FB53D
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details