Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 15:54:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0A804BC0A2F6C9EC2C45FBE2C09E36EDEEC63524F6FD1D0DF630811F41BCCA1B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details