Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 01:51:37 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 04B8F06AAE5BBBA44D2EE8A655965406C0F8F784BF5BC1FF16C7EC4BD1DA6699
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details