Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 00:55:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0113C71276FD5508272D7746DC178BF2B200B3646E4C878E8F5C12576E833C45
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details