Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 03:09:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 006C9B4C2FD02DF16EEAF975BFFDA972F64C4A79BCE7EB1CEB43E00F39BD63FE
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details