Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-04 12:42:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9896757975B2CDCBFF99A8F699F340F2037E014CA6CB5BB0E5131C5FEC0A7562
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post cites The Lancet, not multiple journals. One source is peer-reviewed; three are reader correspondence. While not peer-reviewed, all four cite experts and data and were selected by The Lancet for publication. They are not merely personal opinions. https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish#:~:text=Correspondence,with%20authors%E2%80%99%20replies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1918959386439098499
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9896757975B2CDCBFF99A8F699F340F2037E014CA6CB5BB0E5131C5FEC0A7562
  • createdAtMillis - 1746362548914
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 19189593864390984999896757975B2CDCBFF99A8F699F340F2037E014CA6CB5BB0E5131C5FEC0A7562