Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-03 01:12:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 81C4BC100D5A832AD817CEA391FD81F48282B4BFAF1102C36DDE7AF9382BE093
Participant Details
Original Note:
Claims AB 379 was about making it a felony to "purchase" 16- and 17-year-olds for sex, when the bill deals w/ “solicitation”, targeting intent, not completed purchases. There’s a legal difference. It’s a felony to complete the act. https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/05/california-democrats-teen-sex-solicitation/ https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-05-01/democrats-double-down-against-newsom-remove-felony-penalty-from-minor-solicitation-bill
All Note Details